BEST PAPER AWARDS


The conference will offer the Best Paper Awards for the papers of each stream . A Certificate of Appreciation with the Prize of Rs 3000 /- will be given to the best paper from each stream.


Please note that-

  1. The jury will only consider the nominated papers for the Best Paper Awards selection.
  2. The deadline of the application is 30 days before the conference date.
  3. The jury will evaluate the nominated papers according to-  uniqueness, title, abstract, key words and also in terms of the following elements:

Introduction:

This explains the nature and purpose of the article, the theoretical background relevant to the article’s focus, related research with a clear indication of the gap(s)/limitation(s) in existing knowledge / practice that the article will address, and the practical applications or significance of what the article reports.


Methods:

This section names and justifies the research design; describes the participants/sample (e.g., contextualization, demographics, recruitment/selection criteria, and group assignment), the data collection instruments/ data generation techniques (e.g., task[s] / method(s), equipment, instruments, including a discussion of their validity and reliability, if appropriate, or trustworthiness in qualitative studies), the procedures employed in the study such as treatment(s) or the data generation process, and data analysis. Authors must please align the language of this section with their design (i.e., quantitative and qualitative methods sections will use different research jargon). Authors must comment explicitly on how their work was ethical.


Results / Findings and Discussion:

Results/findings should be clear and concise. The discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, and not repeat them. Authors need to acknowledge their study’s limitations. A combined results and discussion section is often appropriate. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature in the discussion – instead use the literature to show how the results/findings are significant.


Conclusion(s) and Recommendations / Future directions:

The main conclusions of the study may be presented in a short conclusions section, which may stand alone or form a subsection of the discussion, or results and discussion, section. Recommendations/Future directions may stand alone or form a subsection of the discussion or results and discussion section. These include meaningful suggestions for further research and/or practical applications flowing from the study’s conclusions.


References:

References are listed in alphabetical order. Each listed reference is cited in text, and each text citation is listed in the References.


Introduction:

This explains the nature and purpose of the article, the theoretical background relevant to the article’s focus, related research with a clear indication of the gap(s)/limitation(s) in existing knowledge / practice that the article will address, and the practical applications or significance of what the article reports.


  1. The applicants of Best Paper Awards should register for the conference. The nominated papers will not be evaluated in case of not fulfilling the registration requirements.
  2. The awards will be announced at the opening ceremony of the conference and the author(s) of the nominated papers should be present at the opening ceremony.